Academics & Achievement Accountability Board of Education Budget and Finance Calendars Central Administration Delays and Closures Educational Programs Food Services Gifted Education Health Information How to Enroll Laws and Policies Long-Range Plan Meet Our Superintendent Mission and Vision Parent Portal (My Campus) Safety in the Schools
Office of Student Services Special Education Section 504 English Learners Development Homebound Services Homeless/Displaced Students Counseling Services District Crisis Team
Why Work at CMSD? General Information Current Openings Applications & Salary Schedule
Aquatics Center Our Foundation eScrip Program
Visit Our Schools Broadmoor Elementary Canon School Cheyenne Mtn Elementary Gold Camp Elementary Pinon Valley Elementary Skyway Elementary Cheyenne Mtn Junior High Cheyenne Mtn High School Cheyenne Mtn Charter Acad
Central Administration

Central Administration Office

Cheyenne Mountain School District 12
1775 LaClede Street
Colorado Springs, Colorado  80905
Voice:  719-475-6100
Fax:  719-475-6106

Cooper, Walt Superintendent of Schools
Fogarty, John Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement
Steen, Carolena Assistant Superintendent for Student Services
Cassidy, Kevin Executive Director of Technology
Morin, Natalie Executive Director of Business Services
Wangelin, Ernie Director of Facilities

(E-mail can be sent to a staff member by clicking the small envelope next to their name.)

District 12 Organizational Chart

Click on the image below to view the Cheyenne Mountain School District 12 Leadership organizational chart.

Picture of Org Chart.png

Directions to Central Administration

Exit from I-25 onto S. Tejon Street (Exit 140).  Drive south on Tejon Street (in the right lane) for about .5 miles and take a slight right at the stoplight onto W. Cheyenne Blvd.  Drive west on W. Cheyenne Blvd approximately .5 miles and turn right onto LaClede Street. Drive north approximately 100 yards, and the District 12 offices will be on your right at 1775 LaClede Street.

A Message From Our Superintendent

Cooper Field Shot.jpg

Dr. Walt Cooper
(Click for bio)

On several occasions I have written how Colorado assessments are changing in response to the updated Colorado Academic Standards. Previously, I shared thoughts and information about the technical requirements for these assessments, the amount of time required for full test administration, the changing nature of the material tested, and the manner in which the tests are administered (computer vs. paper-and-pencil). 

We knew as far back as early 2013 that changes were going to be significant, so we practiced, we trained, we prepared, and we learned many things through these exercises.   But until now, most all of the information I’ve shared has been largely hypothetical; it was information based on the best data available and our best understanding of the expectations at the time.   Over the course of the last two weeks, however, we have finally been able to grasp much more about the future of the testing (thought we still have much to learn) as we implemented the first set of CMAS tests in our elementary and junior high schools.   So, what have we learned?

From a technical standpoint, we wondered whether the technology would be hard for students to use when taking the assessment.  We learned that the new assessments are built so that, although different, is actually rather easy for students to learn and use.  We also learned that we could use a range of devices for the assessment, the same technology that students use in classrooms throughout the year, so this is familiar to them. 

Logistically, we questioned if network and bandwidth capabilities would be sufficient enough to allow us to test large numbers of students at the same time.  We learned that our infrastructure across the district easily meet the requirements to effectively deliver the test content.

We also learned that the assessments are certainly not free of glitches.  We ran into technical difficulties at the school level when some computers would not display selected items correctly.  Problems on a national level surfaced when the test publisher’s technical support network became unavailable during a critical testing period.  These glitches caused school and district personnel to adjust some daily schedules and react “on the fly” to meet our testing obligations, but students and staff did so admirably.

Beyond the technical components, we have been advised all along that the content of the assessments themselves would be much more rigorous and demanding at all levels.  Based on sample items and practice tests early on and now from student feedback after actual testing, we know this to be true.  The assessments ask students to answer a wider variety of questions, show their work in greater detail, and explain their reasoning. They assess critical-thinking and problem-solving skills in an in-depth manner and ask students to back up their answers with information from the text instead of just offering their opinions. 

All along we anticipated that students would respond more favorably to the computer-based assessments (rather than the paper-and-pencil predecessor) because they would allow for more engaging and innovative assessment items that mirror the engagement technology adds to our everyday classrooms. We were right.  Many students offered unsolicited comments supporting our assumption.

From the students’ perspective, the most common feedback was that the assessments were much “harder.”  I trust their perspective and see this as evidence that the bar has been raised for student achievement in Colorado.  However, simply increasing the difficulty of an assessment does not help students learn to a higher level.  Increasing student achievement is the result of very intentional and focused instruction toward a more rigorous set of standards, and that is now the most pressing challenge for us to undertake.